🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court has allowed Texas to implement a redrawn congressional district plan that may create several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three ruling, handed down on Thursday, approves a appeal by the state to overturn a federal judge's block that had invalidated the redistricting plan in November.

Justices' Reasoning

The federal judge improperly inserted itself into an active primary campaign, causing much confusion and upsetting the fine federal-state balance in elections, the supreme court said in explaining its ruling.

That lower court had determined that Texas had probably sorted voters according to their race – a practice known as racial gerrymandering – when it enacted the new maps. It had ordered the state to use the boundaries drawn after the 2020 census for the next year's election.

Strong Dissent

In a strongly worded dissent, Justice Elena Kagan took issue with the court's decision. She stated that it undermined the work of the district court, observing that its ruling was crafted by a judge selected by ex-President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan argued in a opinion supported by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

Kagan added, Today's ruling guarantees that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its boosted partisan advantage, will control next year's elections. And it means that many Texas voters, without justification, will be placed in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced repeatedly, is a violation of the constitution.

National Map-Drawing Fight

This decision is part of a nationwide contest over the redrawing of electoral maps. Texas is a crucial component in campaigns to alter the U.S. House map to secure a slim Republican majority. Typically, map-drawing takes place after a ten-year survey. Yet the decision by Texas Republicans to move ahead with a aggressive mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Republicans in states like North Carolina and Missouri have also approved new maps that might create a number of additional conservative seats. Democratic lawmakers, meanwhile, have responded with revised boundaries in including California and Virginia, which are intended to balance those projected gains.

Political Reactions

Lone Star State AG hailed the supreme court ruling. In a statement, he said the order defended Texas's fundamental right to draw a map that ensures electoral outcomes aligned with his party. We are setting the precedent for restoring our country, through each electoral district and individual state, he stated.

On the other hand, Democratic representatives lamented the outcome. It's incredibly disappointing that the Court has rubber stamped a map enacted by Texas Republicans which, simply put, is an extreme, racially gerrymandered map, said the leader of a major party election organization.

A senior Democratic figure stated the court had another time eroded its standing by rubber-stamping a race-based map. The ruling demonstrates a willingness to subvert democracy. This Texas plan is a partisan, racially biased scheme to undermine voter will, especially in communities of color, he added.